<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with 1.19.0]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with 1.19.0]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/tags/1.19.0</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:27:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.pycom.io/tags/1.19.0.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 15:49:21 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Codes size 1.18.0 vs. 1.19.0]]></title><description><![CDATA[@robert-hh A further look revealed, that both the LOPY4 and FIPY image are below 1536k. Only if I add one of the IN865 or EU433 regions AND my favorite frozen scripts, the FIPY build exceed 1536k.
Still some slimming is advised, or more room in the partition table.
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/topic/3569/codes-size-1-18-0-vs-1-19-0</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pycom.io/topic/3569/codes-size-1-18-0-vs-1-19-0</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[robert-hh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 15:49:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>