<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Bug in LoPy SNR stats?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi guys!</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm using some LoPy's for a LoRa range analysis. With the stats() method I get information abour RSSI and SNR of the last received packet. When having a small RSSI of like -130 dBm the stats() method gives me SNR values of like -60dB to -80dB. I guess that is a bug because the Semtech SX1272 data sheet (the LoRa chip used by the pycom modules) says the minimum required SNR with SF12 is -20 dB to decode a packet. Is this a bug in calculating the SNR by the LoPy or have I a problem of comprehension?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you for your help :)<br />
Pascal</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/topic/1396/bug-in-lopy-snr-stats</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 19:04:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.pycom.io/topic/1396.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:39:12 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug in LoPy SNR stats? on Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:39:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi guys!</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm using some LoPy's for a LoRa range analysis. With the stats() method I get information abour RSSI and SNR of the last received packet. When having a small RSSI of like -130 dBm the stats() method gives me SNR values of like -60dB to -80dB. I guess that is a bug because the Semtech SX1272 data sheet (the LoRa chip used by the pycom modules) says the minimum required SNR with SF12 is -20 dB to decode a packet. Is this a bug in calculating the SNR by the LoPy or have I a problem of comprehension?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you for your help :)<br />
Pascal</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/post/8746</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pycom.io/post/8746</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pjoerke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:39:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug in LoPy SNR stats? on Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:12:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have to add some information: I can't use the lastest firmware because the modules are spread and so out of my reach :( I flashed all LoPy modules in April so that's the latest firmware I'm currently using.</p>
<p dir="auto">While searching the web for my problem I found this:<br />
<a href="https://github.com/Lora-net/LoRaMac-node/issues/104" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://github.com/Lora-net/LoRaMac-node/issues/104</a></p>
<p dir="auto">It says that there is a bug in the SX1276 driver and so maybe in the SX1272, too. It misses a division by 4of the SNR value... And thats the factor I need. So: Does anyone know if this bug was a thing in the LoPy's too and had been fixed in the last weeks after my last update? I can't find anything about it in the last changelogs...</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/post/8747</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pycom.io/post/8747</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pjoerke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:12:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>