<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Questions about bufsize en data port]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">In de nano gateway example there is a bufsize used of 256. Is it worth reduce this bufsize for performance/stability?</p>
<p dir="auto">In the TTN backoffice I see a payloads size of 34 bytes in the downlink data, so my guess is reducing to 64 bytes would be ok.</p>
<p dir="auto">What is the purpose of the data port?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/topic/2430/questions-about-bufsize-en-data-port</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 12:54:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.pycom.io/topic/2430.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:55:11 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Questions about bufsize en data port on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:55:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">In de nano gateway example there is a bufsize used of 256. Is it worth reduce this bufsize for performance/stability?</p>
<p dir="auto">In the TTN backoffice I see a payloads size of 34 bytes in the downlink data, so my guess is reducing to 64 bytes would be ok.</p>
<p dir="auto">What is the purpose of the data port?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/post/14361</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pycom.io/post/14361</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[rvandam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:55:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>