<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[LoPy OTAA query in documentation -Change in Auth params in OTAA]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I was just revisiting the official pycom documentation on OTAA ( <a href="https://docs.pycom.io/chapter/tutorials/lora/lorawan-otaa.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://docs.pycom.io/chapter/tutorials/lora/lorawan-otaa.html</a> )and I noticed that the parameter of the OTAA function-</p>
<pre><code># create an OTAA authentication parameters
app_eui = binascii.unhexlify('ADA4DAE3AC12676B')
app_key = binascii.unhexlify('11B0282A189B75B0B4D2D8C7FA38548B')

# join a network using OTAA (Over the Air Activation)
lora.join(activation=LoRa.OTAA, auth=(app_eui, app_key), timeout=0)
</code></pre>
<p dir="auto">A few days back, we have to specify <code>dev_eui</code> too. But now it is not the case?<br />
I am using <a href="http://loraserver.io" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">loraserver.io</a> for my application-server and they don't ask app_eui but dev_eui.<br />
P.S.- My device is not responding to OTAA from 3 days, Maybe this is the issue, Please help me, what is the case?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/topic/3417/lopy-otaa-query-in-documentation-change-in-auth-params-in-otaa</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:45:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.pycom.io/topic/3417.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:56:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to LoPy OTAA query in documentation -Change in Auth params in OTAA on Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:56:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I was just revisiting the official pycom documentation on OTAA ( <a href="https://docs.pycom.io/chapter/tutorials/lora/lorawan-otaa.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://docs.pycom.io/chapter/tutorials/lora/lorawan-otaa.html</a> )and I noticed that the parameter of the OTAA function-</p>
<pre><code># create an OTAA authentication parameters
app_eui = binascii.unhexlify('ADA4DAE3AC12676B')
app_key = binascii.unhexlify('11B0282A189B75B0B4D2D8C7FA38548B')

# join a network using OTAA (Over the Air Activation)
lora.join(activation=LoRa.OTAA, auth=(app_eui, app_key), timeout=0)
</code></pre>
<p dir="auto">A few days back, we have to specify <code>dev_eui</code> too. But now it is not the case?<br />
I am using <a href="http://loraserver.io" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">loraserver.io</a> for my application-server and they don't ask app_eui but dev_eui.<br />
P.S.- My device is not responding to OTAA from 3 days, Maybe this is the issue, Please help me, what is the case?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/post/20519</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pycom.io/post/20519</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[shivankgarg98]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:56:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to LoPy OTAA query in documentation -Change in Auth params in OTAA on Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:09:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://forum.pycom.io/uid/2816">@shivankgarg98</a> The dev_eui parameter is optional (see <a href="https://docs.pycom.io/chapter/firmwareapi/pycom/network/lora.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://docs.pycom.io/chapter/firmwareapi/pycom/network/lora.html</a>). If you do not specify it, it is taken from the configuration established when loading the firmware. That however fails sometimes. If you want to be sure that it matches the network setting, you can specify it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/post/20520</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pycom.io/post/20520</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[robert-hh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:09:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to LoPy OTAA query in documentation -Change in Auth params in OTAA on Thu, 28 Jun 2018 22:06:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://forum.pycom.io/uid/98">@robert-hh</a> said in <a href="/post/20520">LoPy OTAA query in documentation -Change in Auth params in OTAA</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">...That however fails sometimes...</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Ok, I'll use explicit dev_eui from now on. Is there a bug report for this?</p>
<ul>
<li>Thanks, Chris.</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/post/20523</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pycom.io/post/20523</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prawnhead]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 22:06:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to LoPy OTAA query in documentation -Change in Auth params in OTAA on Fri, 29 Jun 2018 05:14:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="https://forum.pycom.io/uid/2415">@prawnhead</a> It' less a bug in the firmware, than the way the device is handled by the user and some interference with the background database at Pycom, which keeps the assigned dev_uid. The dev_uid is stored in the device's flash and can be written to that using the updater tool. So you have three elements (flash, user, background system), which have to interact correctly, and there are few way to succeed and many ways to fail.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.pycom.io/post/20536</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pycom.io/post/20536</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[robert-hh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 05:14:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>