Guru Meditation Error - Pycom WiPy
-
@milan The master branch at github https://github.com/pycom/pycom-micropython-sigfox always almost always reflects the latest build, which you can install with pyupgrade. The version number is in the file https://github.com/pycom/pycom-micropython-sigfox/blob/master/esp32/pycom_version.h.
I am not sure which commit to check out to get 1.18.1.r7. The log is not detailed in respect to that file. -
@timh been going over the AWS MQTT msgHandler further. I see a number of more bugs.
For instance if a the handler see's a disconnection, and (tries to reconnect - of course connect() is missing)
The poll registration on the original socket still exists. No poll registration is created when a new socket is created.When I finish reviewing I will post separately a updated message handler.
Some of my earlier changes (above) don't make things worse but are incorrect/incomplete.
T
-
... and one more! Had five Wipys running over the weekend, one died after roughly 37000 sent messages to AWS:
Guru Meditation Error: Core 1 panic'ed (Unknown reason)
And that was it. I'd really appreciate a fix here.
-
@timh When the handler sees a disconnection, _connect_helper() is called, which in turn calls connect in the mqtt client class.
The poll registration is done each time a new socket is created. Look at createSocketConnection
The firmware has an embedded garbage collector
-
@timh self.connect is defined in the MQTTClient class and is passed to the MsgHandler class using self._msgHandler=msgHandler.MsgHandler(self._recv_callback, self.connect)
Your connect function creates a socket, but it does not send the connect packet to the aws server
-
@milan Please can you post the output of:
import os os.uname() -
@oligauc Output is:
>>> os.uname() (sysname='LoPy4', nodename='LoPy4', release='1.18.1.r7', version='v1.8.6-849-d1c5ea9 on 2018-12-17', machine='LoPy4 with ESP32', lorawan='1.0.2', sigfox='1.0.1') -
@oligauc Hmm
May be I am missing something but _verify_connection_state in MQTTMSgHandler has the code below .
self.connect() is in the scope of the MQTTMSgHandler instance - I can't see how self.connect() can be referring to the instance in MQTTClient class.
def _verify_connection_state(self): elapsed = time.time() - self._start_time if not self._waiting_ping_resp and elapsed > self._ping_interval: if self._connection_state == mqttConst.STATE_CONNECTED: self._pingSent=False self._send_pingreq() self._waiting_ping_resp=True elif self._connection_state == mqttConst.STATE_DISCONNECTED: self.connect() self._start_time = time.time() elif self._waiting_ping_resp and (self._connection_state == mqttConst.STATE_CONNECTED or elapsed > self._mqttOperationTimeout): if not self._pingSent: if self._ping_failures <= self._ping_cutoff: self._ping_failures+=1 else: self.connect() else: self._ping_failures=0 self._start_time = time.time() self._waiting_ping_resp=False -
@oligauc said in Guru Meditation Error - Pycom WiPy:
_connect_helper()
Yes that is correct.
However you have a disconnect() method defined in MQTTMsgHandler class which has the following code.
if this is called then_sockis set to None, and will never be deregistered in thecreateSocketConnectionmethoddef disconnect(self): if self._sock: self._sock.close() self._sock = None -
@timh May be these methods don't belong in the class, but given they don't have preceding
_one tends to assume they are public and are there to be used.the
disconnect()method in the MSGHandler class is called bydisconnect()in the MQTTClient, so any explicit disconnect will end up with sock poll registrations not being cleaned up as per previous post. -
two more dead over night.
Guru Meditation Error: Core 1 panic'ed (Unknown reason)I wonder if I should dump the _thread implementation and make a callback for MQTT transmission. Currently in MQTTMsgHandler:
class MsgHandler: def __init__(self, receive_callback, connect_helper): ... _thread.stack_size(8192) _thread.start_new_thread(self._io_thread_func, ())If I would call _io_thread_func (modified of course without while(1)) from my main loop, I might get nearly the same functionality without the guruous _thread.
-
Hi all,
I've run into the same "Guru Meditation Error" issue with our "PySense + FiPy" and "PyTrack + FiPy's" ...
Though the weirdest thing is, it wasn't running any code ... freshly firmware'd ... both boards to version 8 ... and the FiPy's to 1.18.r7 ...
We where doing some field tests ... and noticed we where close to a BIG Power Line ... so we choose to just drive a bit further away ... and wham ... it stopped!
Drove back towards the same spot ... and wham ... the board just ran in an endless loop "Guru Meditation Error" ...
Drove away again ... and wham ... it stopped!
So my question is, how sensitive to magnetic interference (EMI/RFI) are all of PyCom's products?? @robert-hh @Paul-Thornton
-
-
@combaindeft It certainly not something I see reported. Ill ask internally to see if anything more is known.
-
Thanks!
I have btw started a different topic for EMI/RFI Guru-Core-Dump-loop error
https://forum.pycom.io/topic/4342/guru-meditation-error-magnetic-interference-emi-rfi
-
@milan Please can you send your code to: support@pycom.io
Are you using PWM ?
Did you modify the low level c firmware ?
-
@oligauc I can't send your my code, sorry. Important thing is that this error occur when pycom is sending data to Azure IoTHub using HTTPS or MQTTS connections. Pycom is connected to WiFi. I'm suspecting that something is wrong with socket connections.
When I'm sending data every minute to server, error appears few times a day. It is tested with 2 devices and 2 different codes. Common thing is socket connection, and that error always appear after that.
I'm not using PWM and I haven't modified low level c firmware.
-
@milan I found that my devices (pysense+wipy) work fine when just powered by the battery connector and fail quickly when connected via USB. I also suspected MQTT, HTTPS, SSL first, but in my case it looks more like an issue related to the USB connection.
-
@martinnn My pycom devices is also connected via USB. I will try some scenario using battery connector. Thank you.
The reason I think that is not problem in my case is that error hapends on same line (part) of the code. In case of USB connection error I expect more randomness in error scenario.
-
@martinnn What Amperage is the usb power supply your using rated for? I have seen a few situations where at peak power consumption it'll consume out more than a normal old style USB-A socket can put out (this was on an older laptop, however). causing these issues. Would explain why using a LiPo battery with presumably higher max amperage could fix the issues.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login