Guru Meditation Error - Pycom WiPy
-
Hi,
I've got Guru Meditation Error when running my Pycom code.
Below is what I've received on log:Guru Meditation Error: Core 1 panic'ed (LoadProhibited) . Exception was unhandled. Register dump: PC : 0x4008ccdf PS : 0x00060033 A0 : 0x8008b7a5 A1 : 0x3ffc1370 A2 : 0x3ffd455c A3 : 0x00060023 A4 : 0x3ffc52a4 A5 : 0x00000001 A6 : 0x000000fe A7 : 0x00000008 A8 : 0x00000000 A9 : 0x3ffd455c A10 : 0x3ffd455c A11 : 0x00000000 A12 : 0x800fc98d A13 : 0x3ffd9490 A14 : 0x3ffc5fe4 A15 : 0x3f409f14 SAR : 0x00000003 EXCCAUSE: 0x0000001c EXCVADDR: 0x00000004 LBEG : 0x400e675c LEND : 0x400e6798 LCOUNT : 0x00000000 Backtrace: 0x4008ccdf:0x3ffc1370 0x4008b7a2:0x3ffc1390 0x4008a3e9:0x3ffc13b0 0x40086319:0x3ffc13d0 0x40083519:0x3ffc1410 0x4000bfed:0x00000000 ================= CORE DUMP START ================= . . . ================= CORE DUMP END ================= E (24354) esp_core_dump: Skipped 1 tasks with bad TCB! E (24359) esp_core_dump: Crashed task has been skipped! Rebooting...Can someone tell me more information about this error?
-
@milan That ceratinly should not happen with Python. Do you have more information, like the piece of code that crashed, the firmware version.
-
Same here. Guru meditation error on Wipy, latest release FW, sending stuff every 2s to AWS via the builtin AWSIoT library. Also using I2C and asynchronous communication. Happens rarely though, but a killer for a device deployed in the field (it's dead then until someone presses the reset button). We'll add a hardware watchdog for this.
-
@martinnn I wonder if your guru meditation could be due to AWS MQTT lib (threads).
I found I had to make some fixes to that library. (I use the MQTTClient and MQTTMessageHandler classes to connect to a none AWS service that uses TLS.)
I found that there where problems,
for instance I found
self.connect()is called in_verify_connection_state()but connect method isn't defined.That in itself should cause a guru but the next problem could lead to it thread issues.
I found that if a disconnection occurs then underlying thread isn't being killed for the message handler.
In fact I think there is no mechanism in that code to explicitly disconnect reliably and re-connect as threads are left running over time. This causes a fault eventually.
I added connect and modified disconnect
def disconnect(self): if self._sock: self._sock.close() self._sock = None self._conn_state_mutex.acquire() self._exitRequest = True self._conn_state_mutex.release() def connect(self): self.disconnect() self._conn_state_mutex.acquire() self._exitRequest = False self._conn_state_mutex.release() self.createSocketConnection()Added a flag in the handler to mark a request to close the thread and added a guard in the io_thread loop
if self._exitRequest: _thread.exit() raise mqttConst.MQTTDisconnectedThis seems to have made the library more robust, at least for me.
There does still seem to be one other run away thread issue, but my WDT catches that one.
-
@timh I also suspect AWSIoT or threads. I'll look into your suggestions - thanks!
-
@robert-hh Unfortunately I can't share code with you, sorry. Firmware version is v1.18.1.r7. Also, where can I find .elf file from this version, I couldn't find it on GitHub?
@Martinnn @timh I'm not using AWSIoT or threads but same thing happens to me anyway. I hope we will get some help on this, device is so unreliable this way.
-
@milan You have to build you own firmware to get the .elf file. It will be in esp32/build/WIPY/release
-
@robert-hh Ok, but I can't find this release on https://github.com/pycom/pycom-micropython-sigfox/releases
Where could I found source for this release? -
@milan The master branch at github https://github.com/pycom/pycom-micropython-sigfox always almost always reflects the latest build, which you can install with pyupgrade. The version number is in the file https://github.com/pycom/pycom-micropython-sigfox/blob/master/esp32/pycom_version.h.
I am not sure which commit to check out to get 1.18.1.r7. The log is not detailed in respect to that file. -
@timh been going over the AWS MQTT msgHandler further. I see a number of more bugs.
For instance if a the handler see's a disconnection, and (tries to reconnect - of course connect() is missing)
The poll registration on the original socket still exists. No poll registration is created when a new socket is created.When I finish reviewing I will post separately a updated message handler.
Some of my earlier changes (above) don't make things worse but are incorrect/incomplete.
T
-
... and one more! Had five Wipys running over the weekend, one died after roughly 37000 sent messages to AWS:
Guru Meditation Error: Core 1 panic'ed (Unknown reason)
And that was it. I'd really appreciate a fix here.
-
@timh When the handler sees a disconnection, _connect_helper() is called, which in turn calls connect in the mqtt client class.
The poll registration is done each time a new socket is created. Look at createSocketConnection
The firmware has an embedded garbage collector
-
@timh self.connect is defined in the MQTTClient class and is passed to the MsgHandler class using self._msgHandler=msgHandler.MsgHandler(self._recv_callback, self.connect)
Your connect function creates a socket, but it does not send the connect packet to the aws server
-
@milan Please can you post the output of:
import os os.uname() -
@oligauc Output is:
>>> os.uname() (sysname='LoPy4', nodename='LoPy4', release='1.18.1.r7', version='v1.8.6-849-d1c5ea9 on 2018-12-17', machine='LoPy4 with ESP32', lorawan='1.0.2', sigfox='1.0.1') -
@oligauc Hmm
May be I am missing something but _verify_connection_state in MQTTMSgHandler has the code below .
self.connect() is in the scope of the MQTTMSgHandler instance - I can't see how self.connect() can be referring to the instance in MQTTClient class.
def _verify_connection_state(self): elapsed = time.time() - self._start_time if not self._waiting_ping_resp and elapsed > self._ping_interval: if self._connection_state == mqttConst.STATE_CONNECTED: self._pingSent=False self._send_pingreq() self._waiting_ping_resp=True elif self._connection_state == mqttConst.STATE_DISCONNECTED: self.connect() self._start_time = time.time() elif self._waiting_ping_resp and (self._connection_state == mqttConst.STATE_CONNECTED or elapsed > self._mqttOperationTimeout): if not self._pingSent: if self._ping_failures <= self._ping_cutoff: self._ping_failures+=1 else: self.connect() else: self._ping_failures=0 self._start_time = time.time() self._waiting_ping_resp=False -
@oligauc said in Guru Meditation Error - Pycom WiPy:
_connect_helper()
Yes that is correct.
However you have a disconnect() method defined in MQTTMsgHandler class which has the following code.
if this is called then_sockis set to None, and will never be deregistered in thecreateSocketConnectionmethoddef disconnect(self): if self._sock: self._sock.close() self._sock = None -
@timh May be these methods don't belong in the class, but given they don't have preceding
_one tends to assume they are public and are there to be used.the
disconnect()method in the MSGHandler class is called bydisconnect()in the MQTTClient, so any explicit disconnect will end up with sock poll registrations not being cleaned up as per previous post. -
two more dead over night.
Guru Meditation Error: Core 1 panic'ed (Unknown reason)I wonder if I should dump the _thread implementation and make a callback for MQTT transmission. Currently in MQTTMsgHandler:
class MsgHandler: def __init__(self, receive_callback, connect_helper): ... _thread.stack_size(8192) _thread.start_new_thread(self._io_thread_func, ())If I would call _io_thread_func (modified of course without while(1)) from my main loop, I might get nearly the same functionality without the guruous _thread.
-
Hi all,
I've run into the same "Guru Meditation Error" issue with our "PySense + FiPy" and "PyTrack + FiPy's" ...
Though the weirdest thing is, it wasn't running any code ... freshly firmware'd ... both boards to version 8 ... and the FiPy's to 1.18.r7 ...
We where doing some field tests ... and noticed we where close to a BIG Power Line ... so we choose to just drive a bit further away ... and wham ... it stopped!
Drove back towards the same spot ... and wham ... the board just ran in an endless loop "Guru Meditation Error" ...
Drove away again ... and wham ... it stopped!
So my question is, how sensitive to magnetic interference (EMI/RFI) are all of PyCom's products?? @robert-hh @Paul-Thornton
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login