External Flash lose files
-
@robert-hh unfortunately the LFS 2.3 build you created does not work for me.
It dumps core when trying to close 2 x open JSON files, as does the previous LFS build that I tried.It appears to fail between the first and second file close.
You made a comment about LFS being slower. Is there a chance that maybe the second close interferes with the first (that has not completed)????I am going to have to ultimately run LFS to get the flash life that I need.
Any clues further ideas.
I will try to add some delays to see what happens.
-
@tuftec I started on Saturday another long term test running (writing million of times a single file). The test is now at ~800_000 writes. During that test, I see regular core dumps. Not at fixed intervals. I'm on it to find a reason. Alternatively I could go back to LFS2.03 with wear leveling enabled.
So you have seen the same error with the previous LFS? Then going back might not solve the problem.P.S.: I used to prefer FAT because it is more reliable in normal operations. However crashes during files writes have a high chance of total file system corruption.
-
@robert-hh adding 500ms delays before and during the file close sequence made no improvement.
It appears to fail at the second close.
The first file is only open for reading.
The second file has been open for writing.There is a distinct possibility that the second file was closed at an earlier stage in the process before this close is called. But this should not cause a crash.
Any ideas.
-
@robert-hh Yes, I have seen core dumps with previous versions of LFS. That is why I moved to FAT again. But I need the improved file system life.
-
@peterp do you have any thoughts on this one? Solving this one would make the system so much more reliable.
-
@tuftec Does your error happen every time you try?
-
@robert-hh Yes. Happens every single time.
-
@tuftec Can you post the trace dump? Then I can loop the code with the elf file.
-
@robert-hh I will try to capture this tomorrow when I have some time.
-
@tuftec I have looked at four trace dumps in my tests, and all happen during a file close operation. Somewhere down the line, a ISR Watchdog timer fires after entering a critical section. So it looks like a lock-up condition.
At littlefs/vsf_littlefs_file.c, line 104-105 looks interesting. There, the semaphore is taken and then the close call proceeds, which finally ends up in the ISR Watchdog event. The ISR is caused by the rmt driver, which is called for the heartbeat LED! -
@tuftec Could you try to run the test with heartbeat LED off?
-
@robert-hh the heartbeat led is disable in my application already. I will try to capture and send the dump a little later. Thanks.
-
@tuftec Can you also send the shortest version of the script, that causes the bug? I have a FiPy here running w/o problems.
Edit: Do you use the RGB led for anything else? -
@robert-hh I use the heartbeat led for various status indications.
I do not currently have a cut-down test version of the script currently.Here is the crash dump.
backed up nv data 18:08:23: closed file1 abort() was called at PC 0x40099b38 on core 1 ELF file SHA256: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Backtrace: 0x40091f2c:0x3ffe2bf0 0x40092179:0x3ffe2c10 0x40099b38:0x3ffe2c30 0x40085476:0x3ffe2c60 0x40084f89:0x3ffe2c80 0x4000bec7:0x3ffe2ca0 0x400f882a:0x3ffe2cc0 0x400f93c5:0x3ffe2ce0 0x400fa076:0x3ffe2d00 0x400fa13c:0x3ffe2d20 0x4010d399:0x3ffe2d40 0x40108161:0x3ffe2d70 0x40104565:0x3ffe2d90 0x401045f5:0x3ffe2db0 0x40111f4b:0x3ffe2dd0 0x40108274:0x3ffe2e70 0x40104565:0x3ffe2ea0 0x401045f5:0x3ffe2ec0 0x40111f4b:0x3ffe2ee0 0x40108274:0x3ffe2f80 0x40104565:0x3ffe2fe0 0x401045f5:0x3ffe3000 0x40111f4b:0x3ffe3020 0x40108274:0x3ffe30c0 0x40104565:0x3ffe3130 0x40104592:0x3ffe3150 0x400e7351:0x3ffe3170 0x400e75e1:0x3ffe3210 0x400e6029:0x3ffe3230 Rebooting... 18:08:26:Peter.
-
@tuftec said in External Flash lose files:
Thanks. So it seems to happen in a free() call of memory management. Below is the expanded backtrace. That part is not new, and not different to lfs 2.03. And it is also different to the core dumps I see. What I can do is create an image with lfs 2.03 for comparison. Will be at the usual place in a few moments.
BT-0: 0x40091f2c is in invoke_abort (/home/robert/Downloads/MicroPython/pycom-esp-idf/components/esp32/panic.c:156). 156 *((int *) 0) = 0; BT-1: 0x40092179 is in abort (/home/robert/Downloads/MicroPython/pycom-esp-idf/components/esp32/panic.c:171). 171 invoke_abort(); BT-2: 0x40099b38 is in multi_heap_free_impl (/home/peter/docs/pycom-esp-idf/components/heap/multi_heap_platform.h:54). 54 abort(); BT-3: 0x40085476 is in heap_caps_free (/home/peter/docs/pycom-esp-idf/components/heap/heap_caps.c:268). 268 multi_heap_free(heap->heap, ptr); BT-4: 0x40084f89 is in _free_r (/home/peter/docs/pycom-esp-idf/components/newlib/syscalls.c:42). 42 heap_caps_free( ptr ); BT-6: 0x400f882a is in lfs_file_rawclose (littlefs/lfs_util.h:226). 226 free(p); BT-7: 0x400f93c5 is in lfs_file_close (littlefs/lfs.c:5089). 5089 err = lfs_file_rawclose(lfs, file); BT-8: 0x400fa076 is in littlefs_close_common_helper (littlefs/vfs_littlefs.c:326). 326 int res = lfs_file_close(lfs, fp); BT-9: 0x400fa13c is in file_obj_ioctl (littlefs/vfs_littlefs_file.c:105). 105 int res = littlefs_close_common_helper(&self->littlefs->lfs, &self->fp, &self->cfg, &self->timestamp_update); BT-10: 0x4010d399 is in mp_stream_close (../py/stream.c:422). 422 mp_uint_t res = stream_p->ioctl(stream, MP_STREAM_CLOSE, 0, &error); BT-11: 0x40108161 is in fun_builtin_1_call (../py/objfun.c:70). 70 return self->fun._1(args[0]); BT-12: 0x40104565 is in mp_call_function_n_kw (../py/runtime.c:624). 624 return type->call(fun_in, n_args, n_kw, args); BT-13: 0x401045f5 is in mp_call_method_n_kw (../py/runtime.c:640). 640 return mp_call_function_n_kw(args[0], n_args + adjust, n_kw, args + 2 - adjust); BT-14: 0x40111f4b is in mp_execute_bytecode (../py/vm.c:1002). 1002 SET_TOP(mp_call_method_n_kw(unum & 0xff, (unum >> 8) & 0xff, sp)); BT-15: 0x40108274 is in fun_bc_call (../py/objfun.c:287). 287 mp_vm_return_kind_t vm_return_kind = mp_execute_bytecode(code_state, MP_OBJ_NULL); BT-16: 0x40104565 is in mp_call_function_n_kw (../py/runtime.c:624). 624 return type->call(fun_in, n_args, n_kw, args); BT-17: 0x401045f5 is in mp_call_method_n_kw (../py/runtime.c:640). 640 return mp_call_function_n_kw(args[0], n_args + adjust, n_kw, args + 2 - adjust); BT-18: 0x40111f4b is in mp_execute_bytecode (../py/vm.c:1002). 1002 SET_TOP(mp_call_method_n_kw(unum & 0xff, (unum >> 8) & 0xff, sp)); BT-19: 0x40108274 is in fun_bc_call (../py/objfun.c:287). 287 mp_vm_return_kind_t vm_return_kind = mp_execute_bytecode(code_state, MP_OBJ_NULL); BT-20: 0x40104565 is in mp_call_function_n_kw (../py/runtime.c:624). 624 return type->call(fun_in, n_args, n_kw, args); BT-21: 0x401045f5 is in mp_call_method_n_kw (../py/runtime.c:640). 640 return mp_call_function_n_kw(args[0], n_args + adjust, n_kw, args + 2 - adjust); BT-22: 0x40111f4b is in mp_execute_bytecode (../py/vm.c:1002). 1002 SET_TOP(mp_call_method_n_kw(unum & 0xff, (unum >> 8) & 0xff, sp)); BT-23: 0x40108274 is in fun_bc_call (../py/objfun.c:287). 287 mp_vm_return_kind_t vm_return_kind = mp_execute_bytecode(code_state, MP_OBJ_NULL); BT-24: 0x40104565 is in mp_call_function_n_kw (../py/runtime.c:624). 624 return type->call(fun_in, n_args, n_kw, args); BT-25: 0x40104592 is in mp_call_function_0 (../py/runtime.c:598). 598 return mp_call_function_n_kw(fun, 0, 0, NULL); BT-26: 0x400e7351 is in parse_compile_execute (../lib/utils/pyexec.c:103). 103 mp_call_function_0(module_fun); BT-27: 0x400e75e1 is in pyexec_file (../lib/utils/pyexec.c:560). 560 return parse_compile_execute(filename, MP_PARSE_FILE_INPUT, EXEC_FLAG_SOURCE_IS_FILENAME); BT-28: 0x400e6029 is in TASK_Micropython (mptask.c:339). 339 int ret = pyexec_file(main_py); -
@tuftec If you did not see it yet, Fipy tarball with lfs2.03 is here:
https://github.com/robert-hh/Shared-Stuff/blob/master/FiPy-1.20.2.r4-lfs2.0.tar.gz -
@robert-hh thanks. will looking into this further tomorrow.
Peter. -
@serafimsaudade @gijs @tuftec I have a long term test running with the updated firmware, one WiPy3-alike and one LoPy4. The WiPy3 is at 2.5 Million writes, the LoP4 at 2 Million write. The LoPy4 is faster (for whatever reason), so it will overtake the WiPy in the next days. I plan to run in up to 10 Million cycles. That will take another 3 weeks.
During the test I ran into core dumps, caused by the heartbeat LED flashing. So I have a FiPy running just for assessing that bug. I made an issue report for that: https://github.com/pycom/pycom-micropython-sigfox/issues/518
It looks like a race condition between LED "On" and LED "Off", when due to the heavy load especially during file close the "On" cycle is delayed such that it collides with the "Off" Cycle.But I am pretty confident that I found a very simple bug fix. Similar to the one here by just changing a number.Note: Did not fix it. :-( -
-
@serafimsaudade The core dump you showed is about different situation that the one I am hunting. No relation to the RGB led.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better đź’—
Register Login