Welcome to the Pycom forum Forum
    • \[\[global:header.categories\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.recent\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.tags\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.popular\]\]
    • Login

    Explore Pybytes | Official Documentation | Report a Firmware Bug/Issue | GitHub

    lopy/lopy4 - LORA on 433MHz

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved LoPy
    70cm433mhzlora
    10 Posts 6 Posters 3.1k Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G Offline
      g0hww
      last edited by

      I notice that the LoPy4 claims the following operable frequency ranges for LORA:

      LoRa Operating Frequencies

      – 868 MHz (Europe) at +14dBm maximum
      – 915 MHz (North and South America, Australia and New Zealand) at +20dBm maximum
      – 433 MHz (Europe) at +10dBm maximum
      – 470 – 510 MHz (China) at +14dBm maximum

      but that the 'normal' LoPys claim:

      Operating Frequencies

      – 868 MHz (Europe) at +14dBm maximum
      – 915 MHz (North and South America, Australia and New Zealand) at +20dBm maximum

      As a licenced radio amateur, I'm interested in the potential use of these devices in our 70cm band, with covers 430-440 MHz here in the UK. Others, notably the one and only Travis Goodspeed have already been dabbling with this with other hardware and I'd like to have a go with some LoPys.

      Can we confirm that the blurb on the web-page is correct and that the LoPy4 LORA radio is really frequency agile between 868MHz and 433MHz and also confirm whether or not the same is true of the 'normal' LoPy?

      I guess I can test my pair of 'normal' LoPys myself to see if they will tune in the 433MHz band, but if I can get conformation that if I preorder/buy new LoPy4s they will be capable of operation on both 868 and 433 MHz (not concurrently, but in a frequency agile, software controlled fashion) then I'll be ordering a pair imminently.

      Cheers,

      Darren, G0HWW

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • sebS Offline
        seb
        last edited by

        The original LoPy modules cannot operate on the 433MHz band unfortunately. The new LoPy4 on the other hand uses the Semtech SX1276 Transceiver which is capable of using both bands via two separate antenna ports (a 433 one and a 868/915 one). You will be able to switch between bands in software.

        C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • C Offline
          colinza @seb
          last edited by

          @seb Okay so we can switch in software, but where is the software? Can't find that API documented... Board is using v1.8.6-798-gebbcca48-dirty that it came with

          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J Offline
            jmarcelino @colinza
            last edited by jmarcelino

            @colinza

            There is no manual switching involved the module will automatically use the 433 port for any low frequencies (LF) in the listed ranges:

            0_1521106257012_Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at 09.29.29.png

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S Offline
              Sympatron @jmarcelino
              last edited by

              @jmarcelino Does this mean that Band 3 is or will be supported via the 433MHz port?

              J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J Offline
                jmarcelino @Sympatron
                last edited by jmarcelino

                @sympatron
                Band 3 is not supported but you can enable it by removing the validation check from the code:

                https://github.com/pycom/pycom-micropython-sigfox/blob/master/esp32/mods/modlora.c#L1136

                Some of us did this to capture the LoRa satellite transmission at the Things Conference event but that was a pretty strong signal to start with.

                The problem is the RF path has been tuned (via matching network) for 433Mhz so Band 3 (137-175Mhz) will see some significant attenuation and shouldn't be be officially supported.

                C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • C Offline
                  colinza @jmarcelino
                  last edited by

                  @jmarcelino That repo I think is private? Can't seem to access it.

                  As a radio ham I have access to 430-440 mhz here, so I'd love to be able to lock it down to around 434mhz and do some experiments

                  J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J Offline
                    jmarcelino @colinza
                    last edited by

                    @colinza
                    Sorry, corrected the URL now.

                    For Band 2 (430-440 mhz) you don't need to to any changes.

                    C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • bmarkusB Offline
                      bmarkus
                      last edited by

                      Darren,

                      the issue is, that 125kHz bandwidth is not allowed on 70cm in IARU REGION 1. While the SX127x supports lower bandwidth modes, you need TXCO instead of normal XTAL.

                      73... Béla, HA5DI

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C Offline
                        colinza @jmarcelino
                        last edited by

                        @jmarcelino Aha! This is excellent, thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        Pycom on Twitter

                        Pycom