Welcome to the Pycom forum Forum
    • \[\[global:header.categories\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.recent\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.tags\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.popular\]\]
    • Login

    Explore Pybytes | Official Documentation | Report a Firmware Bug/Issue | GitHub

    Lora: Documentation vs. Example code regards OTAA

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved LoPy
    loraotaa
    23 Posts 5 Posters 6.5k Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J Offline
      jmarcelino @ssmith
      last edited by jmarcelino

      @ssmith
      Which region are you in please and what frequency is LORA_FREQUENCY set to in config.py?

      This error seems related to the recent LoRa region changes in 1.16 but it's strange that the nanogateway is able to listen on the correct frequency but not transmit on 923300000.

      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S Offline
        ssmith @jmarcelino
        last edited by ssmith

        @jmarcelino, region=LoRa.US915,. This worked fine with 1.15. and here is lora config

        lora.init(mode=LoRa.LORA, frequency=918900000, power_mode=LoRa.ALWAYS_ON, tx_power=20, bandwidth=LoRa.BW_125KHZ, sf=7,
                      preamble=8, coding_rate=LoRa.CODING_4_8, tx_iq=False, rx_iq=False)
        
        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J Offline
          jmarcelino @ssmith
          last edited by

          @ssmith
          Could you add region=LoRa.US915 as a parameter in both lora.init() please?

          S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            ssmith @jmarcelino
            last edited by ssmith

            @jmarcelino It's there, that was a different config file from my previous test just to show the frequency. Here's the config from the nano_gateway file.

                    self.lora = LoRa(
                        mode=LoRa.LORA,
                        region=LoRa.US915,
                        frequency=self.frequency,
                        bandwidth=self.bw,
                        sf=self.sf,
                        preamble=8,
                        coding_rate=LoRa.CODING_4_5,
                        tx_iq=True
                    )
            
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S Offline
              ssmith @jmarcelino
              last edited by

              @jmarcelino I also tried AU915 with the same result. I'll try EU next. I assume with the generic FW now that it should accept it.

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • robert-hhR Offline
                robert-hh @jmarcelino
                last edited by

                @jmarcelino Cannot try more, I think I expired my downlink message quota (of 10?) for the day.

                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Offline
                  ssmith @robert-hh
                  last edited by

                  @robert-hh Are you going to TTN? I've sent thousands of messages there in a day during testing.

                  robert-hhR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S Offline
                    ssmith @ssmith
                    last edited by ssmith

                    @jmarcelino Wasn't able to get EU868 to work with LoRaWAN. Gave me a frequency error. I was able to set it up and send raw LoRa between 2 LoPy4's at both 868 and 915 bands without changing the FW. Looks like it is in the LoRaWAN stack.

                    robert-hhR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • robert-hhR Offline
                      robert-hh @ssmith
                      last edited by

                      @ssmith Yes, I'm using TTN. As far as I can could read, the limit is for downlink messages, from TTN to the node. Uplink, to TTN, I did not experience any limit.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • robert-hhR Offline
                        robert-hh @ssmith
                        last edited by robert-hh

                        @ssmith Besides that, no luck. Simple device-to-device works, the power getting out of the antenna looks similar, with the FiPy a little bit (25% = 2 dB) stronger. But that may be within the setup-variation.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A Offline
                          asavvin
                          last edited by

                          Hello!
                          I am having issue with activating using method otaa lopy with ttn gateway fot US915.
                          whats correct code i should use I searched a lot of topics over weekend and could not find correct code.
                          Thank you

                          Same time using ttn node US915 with ttn gateway activation worked as shown.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 2 / 2
                          • First post
                            Last post

                          Pycom on Twitter

                          Pycom