Welcome to the Pycom forum Forum
    • \[\[global:header.categories\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.recent\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.tags\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.popular\]\]
    • Login

    Explore Pybytes | Official Documentation | Report a Firmware Bug/Issue | GitHub

    Sigfox Downlink ENETDOWN - LoPy4

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved LoPy
    11 Posts 3 Posters 92 Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      miwink
      last edited by

      Hi,

      I have a question regarding the downlink connection in sigfox. Every time I try to send a message with downlink enabled I get a ENETDOWN error. In the sigfox backend I can see that the downlink message has been ackd.

      I've read somewhere on this forum when discussing the fipy, that this may be due to the downlink connection using sigofox fsk mode, which also does not work on the Lopy4 as written in the documentation.

      Is my problem related to fsk mode not working on the lopy4? If not, what could be the problem?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E Offline
        Eric73
        last edited by

        @miwink Hi, Lopy4 doesn't support sigfox FSK in point to point mode, but don't worry it receive sigfox fsk downlink from sigfox network.

        OK on sigfox backend you see what exactly (you can post picture of your message satus)? Have you set some data in your downlink callback ?

        My Lopy4 work fine in sigfox with uplink/downlink since 2 years now in field so keep hope that your work with downlink :-)

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          miwink
          last edited by

          @Eric73 Hi,

          Thanks for the reply!! :D

          I see, nice to at least get some sort of confirmation that it is supposed to work on the LoPy4, the documentation and some other posts are not very clear whether the lopy4 supports downlink or not (in my opinion).

          Screenshot 2020-07-01 at 14.13.26.png

          For now I have tried both downlink callbacks and Direct downlink, and both seem to become acked in the sigfox backend, but I still get enetdown on the device. As you can see in the picture the downlink was acked by the network. In this message I used the direct downlink provided by the backend, that always replies with "deadbeefcafebabe".

          Maybe it has something to do with my connection quality?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            miwink @Eric73
            last edited by

            @Eric73

            Well, now I did something stupid and updated the firmware, thinking that might have been the problem with downlink not working. The result is that I know can’t access the repl with the pymakr plugin (stuck at connecting to ...), can’t download or upload anything (stuck at download fail: timeout, reset manually) and can’t update the firmware as I only get sha1 error checksum. I use the latest tools and firmwares.

            I can update the lopy through the advanced settings of the update tool, but the problem persists.

            I suppose there is a way to fix this, but I don’t know how.

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              miwink @miwink
              last edited by

              @miwink

              QUICK UPDATE: Fixed the pymakr access problem, had to reset everything, like the flash, the config and the nvs partition. Now it works.

              The sigfox downlink is still not working though.

              E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E Offline
                Eric73 @miwink
                last edited by

                @miwink In Sigfox backend, can you click on the green down arrow to see detail about downlink sigfox status and post result?
                LQI: Link Quality Indicator is ggod for uplink, so downlink must work too

                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  miwink @Eric73
                  last edited by

                  @Eric73 Screenshot 2020-07-02 at 08.20.46.png

                  All downlink messages have identical details.

                  E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E Offline
                    Eric73 @miwink
                    last edited by Eric73

                    @miwink So it must work, try different antenna or even try outisde building you must receive your downlink.
                    Please note that sigfox downlink message is very limited, no more that 4 by day is allowed, so shutdown your board for 24 hours, then try outside or with a new antenna. Each time the sigfox bacjend send you a message you go nearest the limit of message allowed for you.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      miwink @Eric73
                      last edited by

                      @Eric73 Ok, so I will try that. I don't know that much about antennas, are there some sort of requirements for what type of antenna it should be. Or all they all pretty much the same?

                      E robert-hhR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • E Offline
                        Eric73 @miwink
                        last edited by

                        @miwink I am not an expert in atenna but here some exemple of antenna that can be used, you can try to change your uFL-SMA cable too

                        https://eu.mouser.com/Passive-Components/Antennas/_/N-8w0fa?P=1z0wn4uZ1y9315m

                        https://eu.mouser.com/ProductDetail/RF-Solutions/FLEXI-SMA90-868?qs=17u8i%2FzlE88aIMOLgraHrA%3D%3D

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • robert-hhR Offline
                          robert-hh @miwink
                          last edited by

                          @miwink Better use wavelength/2 antennas, even if they are larger. The first one @Eric73 linked or the pycom antenna are such. They are more forgiving in handling.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post

                          Pycom on Twitter

                          Pycom