What's up with sigfox in the github repository name?

[jellium]

Hi,

Is there any reason, and what would it be then, why you switched the Github repository name from pycom-micropython to pycom-micropython-sigfox, with the notice "DO NOT USE - THIS IN AN OLD VERSION. Use pycom-micropython-sigfox instead."?
I mean, why isn't it pycom-micropython-sigfox-lora or maybe micropython-sigfox-lora-wifi-ble, or maybe even micropython-sigfox-lora-wifi-ble-with-an-esp32-as-the-great-mcu-to-rule-them-all?

Thanks! (-;

[dbrgn]

@jmarcelino you could have pushed the sigfox binaries to a separate branch (without history) and then made that branch the default branch. that way you wouldn't have broken anyone's git remote or pull requests while still hiding the history :)

[jellium]

@jmarcelino thanks! That makes sense now. I could see sigfox binaries in the repo and understand now the reason for that.

[jmarcelino]

@jellium

See https://forum.pycom.io/topic/930/new-firmware-release-1-6-9-b1-frozen-code-support-and-framebuf

“There's no history in order to avoid making the closed source files from Sigfox public”

[jellium]

OK!
But why forking the entire repository and not just committing the addition of the new Sigfox library?

[jmarcelino]

@jellium
Because the previous version didn’t support sigfox