Welcome to the Pycom forum Forum
    • \[\[global:header.categories\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.recent\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.tags\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.popular\]\]
    • Login

    Explore Pybytes | Official Documentation | Report a Firmware Bug/Issue | GitHub

    [SOLVED] LoPy LoRa general consumption/effiency (code and scope printscreen)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved LoPy
    lora antennaloralopy
    22 Posts 6 Posters 6.3k Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • IplookyI Offline
      Iplooky @jmarcelino
      last edited by Iplooky

      @jmarcelino would tx_power = 20 (the maximum value) influence in any way ? (in comparison with the default value?)

      I've read one of your old posts : https://forum.pycom.io/topic/1652/solved-lopy-max-transmit-power-20-dbm-at-869-mhz but being 7 month old I was wondering if updates/imporvements appeared.

      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        jmarcelino @Iplooky
        last edited by

        @iplooky
        TX Power = 20dBm isn't legal in Europe for most channels (there are some exceptions), by law it should be 14dBm.

        But yes it generally would greatly increase the signal (at the cost of higher power consumption).

        IplookyI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • IplookyI Offline
          Iplooky @jmarcelino
          last edited by

          @jmarcelino the reciever code should be the same in any case or do I need there to modify Lora's paramethers too?

          I mean :

          from network import LoRa
          import socket
          import time
          
          
          lora = LoRa(mode=LoRa.LORA, rx_iq=True ,frequency=863000000)
          s = socket.socket(socket.AF_LORA, socket.SOCK_RAW)
          s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_LORA, socket.SO_DR, 5)
          s.setblocking(False)
          
          print("start")
            while True:
            mesaj = s.recv(64)
            if(mesaj != b''):
              print(mesaj)
          

          ..should be a universal code OR should I try to modify there too ?(DR,SF,freq)

          Also:

          • from what i've understand DR and SF are complementary, if DR is 5 that means automatically that SF is 7 (and therefore I should not modify it because it's known already from DR) ?
          • tx_power=20 should have also a rx_power=20 or just rx_iq=True ?
          • putting the 2 lopy's at several meters and testing the code has the same bad results (poor transmission)
          robert-hhR J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • robert-hhR Offline
            robert-hh @Iplooky
            last edited by robert-hh

            @iplooky How is your antenna set-up? And what do you call a poor transmission?

            IplookyI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              jmarcelino @Iplooky
              last edited by

              @iplooky
              In LoRa mode the socket.SO_DR socket options are ignored, those are meant for LoRaWAN mode.

              For LoRa please set all these parameters at init time in your LoRa() call, for LoRaWAN set it via socket options.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • IplookyI Offline
                Iplooky @robert-hh
                last edited by

                @robert-hh poor transmission means the following: if I want to send a short message (7characters) it is a slightly chance to recieve it from the first time ( but still I send it 6 times consecutively just to be shure ), 10,20,40 or 80 characters have a nearly to 0 chance to be recieved. (10 meters, SF=7/DR=5 , TX_power=20 )

                @jmarcelino so:

                 lora = LoRa(mode=LoRa.LORA, tx_power=20 , sf=7 ,frequency=863000000) #europe 863MHz
                 s = socket.socket(socket.AF_LORA, socket.SOCK_RAW)
                 s.setblocking(False)
                

                should work just fine ?

                robert-hhR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • robert-hhR Offline
                  robert-hh @Iplooky
                  last edited by

                  @iplooky Hard to say what's wrong. I made my first test with the lopy-lopy examples https://github.com/pycom/pycom-libraries/tree/master/examples/lopy-lopy, and they worked ok, as long as I started lopy-b first. No problem with a short distance.
                  I have also set up a LoPy as TTN gateway and a FiPy a TTN node, and walked away like 500m from the gateway. Still at rrsi of -100, being able to send and receive messages. I also receive messages at the gateway from nodes like 3 km away, estimated from the rssi level of -126 to -130. I'll try some larger (than 500m) distances later.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • IplookyI Offline
                    Iplooky
                    last edited by

                    Solved the TX part using the functions chrono.start() / chrono.read() / chrono.stop() among lora.callback() and lora.events()

                    It now takes 28ms to send 1 character, 58ms to send 20, 115ms to send 60 and so on...

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • IplookyI Offline
                      Iplooky
                      last edited by

                      I am in equal measure happy and mad, the ONLY problem regarding the transmission quality was the SF, at the default value it had the biggest problems but when I put it to 12(maximum) it worked just fine (in short distances too).
                      Altough it is an old post I hope that someone with the same problem with find this answer usefull in the future!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B Offline
                        braulio
                        last edited by

                        Please Help me in this code.
                        import time
                        chrono = Timer.Chrono()
                        ...
                        chrono.start()
                        time.sleep(5)
                        chrono.stop()
                        ....
                        print(chrono.read())
                        I measure 5023 seconds. How can I make accurate measurements?. It should be 5 seconds

                        IplookyI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • IplookyI Offline
                          Iplooky @braulio
                          last edited by

                          Hello @braulio.
                          I think the extra milliseconds are from Lopy info processing, you can try with a different number (10 seconds, 20, 30 etc) and the "extra" time is the same then you have a solution. Also you hsould try to make a new post, the topic is quite different from this one.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 1 / 2
                          • First post
                            Last post

                          Pycom on Twitter

                          Pycom