Welcome to the Pycom forum Forum
    • \[\[global:header.categories\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.recent\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.tags\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.popular\]\]
    • Login

    Explore Pybytes | Official Documentation | Report a Firmware Bug/Issue | GitHub

    New development firmware release v1.19.0.b1

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Beta Announcements & Development News
    firmware
    22 Posts 10 Posters 5.5k Views 10 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rcolisteteR Offline
      rcolistete @iwahdan
      last edited by

      @iwahdan
      Any eletric current measurement already made on this light sleep mode ?

      My "MicroPython Samples". My "MicroPython Firmwares" with many options (double precision, ulab, etc).

      I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • I Offline
        iwahdan @rcolistete
        last edited by

        Hi @rcolistete , yes in light sleep mode the current consumption on a Lopy is 3.5 mA with RTC peripherals ON

        Wahdan

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • S Offline
          Sympatron @Xykon
          last edited by

          @xykon I looked into LittleFS and it supports custom attributes per file/folder. So I think timestamps can be implemented. Is there any plan to do so?

          X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • X Offline
            Xykon administrators @Sympatron
            last edited by

            @sympatron said in New development firmware release v1.19.0.b1:

            @xykon I looked into LittleFS and it supports custom attributes per file/folder. So I think timestamps can be implemented. Is there any plan to do so?

            I will ask the developer who implemented LittleFS to look into that. It would help if you could provide a use case where this is relevant.

            Christian Ehlers

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • S Offline
              Sympatron @Xykon
              last edited by

              @xykon I don't have a specific use case. I just wanted to point out that it would not be too hard to implement, because @bmarkus said it might be an issue for some people.

              For us it is a lot more important when this version will be available on GitHub. Since we use a custom firmware we cannot really use the new features until I can merge them with our fork.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • G Offline
                gregcope @iwahdan
                last edited by gregcope

                @iwahdan what is the assumed current category consumption in light sleep mode?

                I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • I Offline
                  iwahdan @gregcope
                  last edited by

                  Hi @gregcope for light sleep current consumption is 3.5 mA

                  Wahdan

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • robert-hhR Offline
                    robert-hh @iwahdan
                    last edited by

                    @iwahdan machine.sleep(time): the time seem to be ms, not us.

                    I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • I Offline
                      iwahdan @robert-hh
                      last edited by iwahdan

                      @robert-hh yes it is a mistake in my post, I’ve corrected it
                      Thanks

                      Wahdan

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S Offline
                        Sympatron @Xykon
                        last edited by

                        This post is deleted!
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C Offline
                          Colateral
                          last edited by

                          Do you push it in github for make build? There is still 1.18.0.

                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S Offline
                            Sympatron @Colateral
                            last edited by

                            @colateral It's in the development branch.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                            Register Login
                            • 1
                            • 2
                            • 1 / 2
                            • First post
                              Last post

                            Pycom on Twitter

                            Pycom