New firmware release, version 1.6.4.b1
-
@lars
did you removed wire (G23-GND) after sucesfull upgrade? -
@zmrzli
Your BLE advertising data is invalid according to the Bluetooth spec. The first octet is 1 so you're specifying you are sending one byte for that unit. That's exactly what you're getting :-)
Let's move this discussion to your original post https://forum.pycom.io/topic/723/bluetooth-advertising-data -
@livius yes I removed the G23-GND wire. I tried serveral disconnects to power and only 3v3 and GND plus plus P0,P1 for UART were connected. Even without uart there is no wifi AP available any more, as was before the update.
For safe mode I tried 3v3-p12 for as long as the most rapid flashing of the orange led. -
@lars
could you post the serial connection messages again, either pasting here or somewhere like pastebin.com. It seems they didn't show on your other post -
@jmarcelino You are right of course. There was a message, that I didn't have the rights to upload a file here. Here is the pastbin: http://pastebin.com/3RaMdeJ2
-
@lars it might be that there's a conflict with the NV storage area on your WiPy and the current firmware. I have just updated the firmware package online in order to erase that area before applying the new firmware. Could you please try the update again and let me know? Thanks!
Cheers,
Daniel -
By the way, I do want to thank whoever fixed the OSX GUI firmware updater so that it 1) shows some of the output from the underlying tools, and more importantly 2) knows about pycom.io's TLS certificate. That made my messing about above that little bit easier :-)
Pete
-
@daniel although pycom does still report the same version number 1.6.4.b1 on update I hope, that I got the new version. The behavior is similar but the serial output is slightly different: http://pastebin.com/EN30c4Nk
Thank you all very much for your quick responses! -
This post is deleted! -
@daniel
I see that some timings/stability improved in pin.
Now i am able read samsung tv codes without any problem from python code without need of C function as previously :)
I tested this i suppose in many previous versions (last tested lower than 1.5) and it was not stable enought but now it work :)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login