Welcome to the Pycom forum Forum
    • \[\[global:header.categories\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.recent\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.tags\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.popular\]\]
    • Login

    Explore Pybytes | Official Documentation | Report a Firmware Bug/Issue | GitHub

    LoPy Nano-Gateway

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Guides
    62 Posts 27 Posters 50.6k Views 31 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R Offline
      Roberto @feabhas
      last edited by Roberto

      Hi @feabhas
      yeah, that sounds about right. Change that please. Ill edit the post accordingly Thanks

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C Offline
        Colateral @Roberto
        last edited by Colateral

        @Roberto Your example it is a good start but looping and blocking might not be a good approach.

        We built another script that is using threads with blocking socket ... and run the script on a minimal Lora "star" network: one GW and 2 NODES. For each device you have to configure tx,rx and device id in cfg file . and upload the script and cfg file on it and run the script in Putty (not Pymakr). We didn't faced with this script clashing issues.. but we faced other issues.

        You will see that after awhile on GW, the script is ending with a memory leak... but this is never happening on the nodes.
        If you run the script from 3 Pymakr instances ... sometimes is working for hours and after that the GW is stop sending.

        We conclude that is something wrong on the stack.

        The issue might be related only to rx_iq configuration.
        https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzRE8IpnMMnLNHBseDJWblN4VGM?usp=sharing

        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R Offline
          Roberto @Colateral
          last edited by

          Hi @Colateral
          As i wrote in my last message, there is a new example of the nano-gateway with a non-blocking loop approach.
          Regarding the memory issues we will look into this. I left the code on the other post running for 3 hours without any problems. I will leave it running today on a test bench for 24+ h to see if there are any problems and monitor the memory while it transmits. Will let you know the results.

          The link to the new code is
          https://forum.pycom.io/post/3242

          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C Offline
            Colateral @Roberto
            last edited by

            @Roberto HI Roberto. Thanks. I ran the last script and is running fine. Regarding the memory leak, I believe is related with socket blocking approach. If we change the script and move to non blocking (as your script does) everything works fine.

            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R Offline
              Roberto @Colateral
              last edited by

              @Colateral
              Thanks for the quick response, i'll try a blocking approach to see if i can reproduce the error and check whats the root of it.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Offline
                assia
                last edited by

                @Colateral said in LoPy Nano-Gateway:
                Hi @Roberto i am bbegginer in LoRa and i don't understand the use of rx_iq and tx_iq.!
                thanks

                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B Offline
                  borjam @assia
                  last edited by

                  @assia said in LoPy Nano-Gateway:

                  @Colateral said in LoPy Nano-Gateway:
                  Hi @Roberto i am bbegginer in LoRa and i don't understand the use of rx_iq and tx_iq.!

                  It's easy. A LoRaWAN network is not a peer to peer network. There is a master (the gateway) that communicates with the nodes, but there is no node to node communication.

                  Imagine that one of your nodes has the receiver active and another one transmits. The transmission is intended to be received by the gateway, of course (we said that there is no node-to-node communication) but the receiving node will get the packet anyway, if only to discard it.

                  That reception and discarding has an energy cost. How do you avoid it? By having the nodes transmit in a mode that a node can't understand, only the gateway.

                  Now, imagine this scenario: you make the nodes use tx_iq inversion (which is a sort of signal inversion) and the gateway use rx_iq inversion.

                  In this case, a signal transmitted by a node will be inverted, and the gateway will successfully decode it. But other nodes, expecting a non inverted signal, won't detect the inverted signal. So you have just avoided the unintended packet reception problem.

                  A C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • A Offline
                    assia @borjam
                    last edited by

                    @borjam
                    Thanks for the quick response, It's much clearer now.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C Offline
                      Colateral @borjam
                      last edited by

                      @borjam So how you can implement a mesh network using Lora? You put the GW in both tx and rx ?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Offline
                        assia
                        last edited by

                        Hi @Roberto I tried to modify your code because I need to send a payload that contains the current time with a header containing mac address of the node and the length of the payload. Everything went well on the node side but rated nano gateway I have an Index Error: bytes index out of rang. it is because the adresse mac ? knowing that lora.mac() give : b'p\xb3\xd5I\x95kA\xf3' with length=8 but i don't understand what does mean the : b'p......' and how the length is 8 !!

                        thanks

                        node

                        # LoRa node
                        
                        SRC_ADR_MAC=lora.mac()
                        #compteur packets 
                        PACKETs_Cnt=5
                        while(PACKETs_Cnt>0):
                           
                            # Package send containing a simple string
                            msg=time.time()
                            msg_len=len(str(msg))
                            
                            pkg = struct.pack('!%dsBi' % len(SRC_ADR_MAC), SRC_ADR_MAC, msg_len, msg)
                            
                            lora_sock.send(pkg)
                            
                            PACKETs_Cnt=PACKETs_Cnt-1
                            time.sleep(5)
                        

                        nano GW

                        # LoRa GW
                        
                        while (True):
                           
                            recv_pkg = lora_sock.recv(255)
                            if (len(recv_pkg) > 2):
                        
                                device_adr_mac, msg_len, msg = struct.unpack('!%dsBi' %8 ,   recv_pkg) 
                        # %8 because len(lora.mac())=8
                        
                                print('Device: %s - Pkg:  %s' % (device_adr_mac, msg))
                        
                            time.sleep(5)
                        
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          MJ
                          last edited by

                          Hi there, i am still new to lopy. I have try the example of the Lora.nanogateway code (https://docs.pycom.io/chapter/tutorials/lopy/lora-mac-nano-gateway.html) with only 1 lopy as gateway and 1 lopy as node. There is no response between both of them after i have coded it. What happen to this? Thank you.

                          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C Offline
                            Colateral @MJ
                            last edited by

                            @mj Are you using 2 instances of pymaker ? If not, describe what you did.

                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M Offline
                              MJ @Colateral
                              last edited by

                              @colateral Hi, i am using 1 gateway that only with pymaker opened while the node i using the power bank to power up. I have try both in vice versa yet no result showing out.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              • 1
                              • 2
                              • 3
                              • 4
                              • 3 / 4
                              • First post
                                Last post

                              Pycom on Twitter

                              Pycom