Welcome to the Pycom forum Forum
    • \[\[global:header.categories\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.recent\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.tags\]\]
    • \[\[global:header.popular\]\]
    • Login

    Explore Pybytes | Official Documentation | Report a Firmware Bug/Issue | GitHub

    Does LoRaWAN officially support the Nano Gateway concept?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Comments & Feedback
    pycomttnlorawannano gatewaylopy
    4 Posts 3 Posters 938 Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Offline
      Prawnhead
      last edited by

      Guys, I've been using a nano gateway to The Things Network (TTN) while learning about LoRaWAN.

      My question is: Does LoRaWAN officially support the Nano Gateway concept?

      The only documentation I can find on nano gateways is from Pycom or TTN. I'm concerned that using a nano gateway, and in particular locking down channels to one frequency, will "break" LoRaWAN. By that I mean, I wonder if other people's LoRaWAN devices will try to connect to my nano gateway and fail because it's not a properly configured gateway. If so, maybe they're unable to connect to a real gateway that may be further away.

      Thanks for any pointers to documentation/specifications that would conclusively answer this!

      • Chris
      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bmarkusB Offline
        bmarkus
        last edited by

        No it doesn't. The correct question is

        "Is single channel GW LoRaWAN compliant?"

        The answer is NO.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • J Offline
          jcaron @Prawnhead
          last edited by

          @prawnhead A gateway does not advertise its presence, it passively waits for join requests.

          As long as your gateway/network does not accept join requests for devices it doesn't know (which it shouldn't, and probably can't, as it doesn't have the relevant ids and keys), it can't disturb those devices (beyond the fact you're sharing the airwaves with other devices and gateways of course).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • bmarkusB Offline
            bmarkus
            last edited by bmarkus

            LoRaWAN is using a non-licensed shared frequency band. As long as you meet local regulations, e.g. in Europe max. 1% transmit duty cycle, do not exceed transmit power and bandwidth limits you are safe. It is not about LoRaWAN it is about local radio regulations. These rules are the same for single and 'normal' multi channel GW's.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

            Register Login
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post

            Pycom on Twitter

            Pycom