Comments & Feedback

• C

  Web shop codes for Christmas?
  Dec 24, 2019, 1:41 AM • cmisztur   Dec 24, 2019, 1:41 AM

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  70
  Views

  No one has replied

• S

  connected device info for WLAN
  Dec 24, 2019, 12:33 AM • Shimanto   Dec 24, 2019, 12:33 AM

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  74
  Views

  No one has replied

• M

  cant connect W01 to Raspberry Pi 3 b+
  Nov 27, 2019, 1:45 PM • mullis   Nov 27, 2019, 1:45 PM

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  187
  Views

  No one has replied

• D

  Universal IP67 Case - feedback
  Mar 13, 2019, 12:55 AM • dbrosy   Nov 27, 2019, 9:11 AM

  8
  3
  Votes
  8
  Posts
  867
  Views

  Nov 27, 2019, 9:11 AM

  @ferfersan6 If It Don't Fit, Use a Bigger Hammer.
• M

  This topic is deleted!
  Nov 25, 2019, 4:30 PM • mullis   Nov 25, 2019, 4:30 PM

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  41
  Views
• F

  acc.enable_activity_interrupt() axis?
  Nov 8, 2019, 11:24 AM • ferfersan6   Nov 8, 2019, 11:24 AM

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  131
  Views

  No one has replied

• F

  Has anyone tried GPS + IP67 case?
  Oct 22, 2019, 8:13 AM • ferfersan6   Oct 25, 2019, 10:52 AM

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  346
  Views

  F Oct 25, 2019, 10:52 AM

  @oligauc Ok, thank you for the attention
• E

  AT&T CAT-M, Vodafone NBIOT?
  at&t vodafone carrier certifi • May 8, 2018, 4:06 PM • electronic   Oct 15, 2019, 4:17 PM

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  1.1k
  Views

  B Oct 15, 2019, 4:17 PM

  @jmarcelino It's been over a year since the last post, and I'm new here... has the AT&T certification been completed yet? Thanks!
• B

  Pyscan RFID use on moving object
  Oct 3, 2019, 4:07 PM • Berli   Oct 3, 2019, 4:37 PM

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  192
  Views

  J Oct 3, 2019, 4:37 PM

  @Berli 13.56 MHz (HF) RFID/NFC is really not designed for long distance scanning. That's something that is usually done using UHF (433 MHz or 868/915 MHz) instead, using active tags (which have their own power source). Don't forget that in your situation: the reader needs to provide power to the tag the tag needs to wake up and engage dialog with the reader there can be several back-and-forth exchanges between the tag and the reader all of this needs to happen while the tag is in range of the reader The range over which HF RFID works is usually counted in centimetres, not meters. I don't remember the exact details, but I believe it's the reader that initiates the conversation by "scanning" for tags, so this means you would also need to take into account the scan interval. In addition, if the tag is moving too fast, you may have Doppler effects to factor in (which will shift the frequency up or down). What kind of distance are you trying to cover, what kind of speed are your considering, what kind of tag are your using? Does the tag have its own power source?
• V

  Confusing power requirements in datasheet G01
  Sep 24, 2019, 12:49 PM • Vincent   Sep 30, 2019, 12:36 PM

  5
  2
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  425
  Views

  V Sep 30, 2019, 12:36 PM

  @robert-hh Indeed, the reference board schema's are presenting a 0R to prevent the VDD33 from being fed by the VDD5. But there is nothing documented about removing it to work on the G01. And the datasheet and pinout schematic are ambiguous about being in input or output. So I'm not gonna order a batch of prototypes on documentation that is clearly out of date. Nor do I think it is very efficient for us to be figuring this out. Maybe @Fred can give us a hint or knows somebody who should know?
• T

  Sales / Purchase support contact number for Pycom
  support sales • Sep 17, 2018, 9:56 AM • tanmoy_dutta   Sep 22, 2019, 9:40 PM

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  767
  Views

  J Sep 22, 2019, 9:40 PM

  I have a really serious issue with Atom and PyMakr. I've been posting the bug reports to the PyMakr and Atom Github forum. I've updated my Atom to 1.40.1 on Mac OSX, running version 10.13.6. I'm using PyMakr 1.4.16. But I'm getting... Uncaught Error: Could not locate the bindings file. Tried: → /Users/johndraper/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings/build/bindings.node → /Users/johndraper/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings/build/Debug/bindings.node → /Users/johndraper/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings/build/Release/bindings.node → /Users/johndraper/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings/out/Debug/bindings.node → /Users/johndraper/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings/Debug/bindings.node → /Users/johndraper/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings/out/Release/bindings.node → /Users/johndraper/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings/Release/bindings.node → /Users/johndraper/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings/build/default/bindings.node → /Users/johndraper/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings/compiled/10.2.0/darwin/x64/bindings.node There is an active thread on GitHub, but the reason why I'm posting this here, is because of this month long issue which IMHO has NOT been solved as far as I'm concerned, now my job is in jeopardy. I'm more then 2 months behind in my work, I'm unable to contact the developers and I discovered that the "Install" script is full of bugs. Let me explain. First off, following the error message I get, it gives a path that includes a "build" directory, as well as a "Debug" directory. On my machine, I don't have these following directories in my path to node_modules.... $ pwd /Users/johndraper/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings/node_modules As you can clearly see, this path is different then what PyMakr displayed, and there is NO "Debug" or "build" directory in that path. It seems the people in the github forum seems to have ignored my statement and subsequent postings. By the way, before installing Atom, I completely removed my ~/.atom directory so the newly installed Atom could re-build them. After that, one forum member posted this: cd ~/.atom/packages/pymakr/ npm install @serialport/bindings ln -s ~/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/@serialport/bindings ~/.atom/packages/pymakr/node_modules/serialport/bindings Others claimed it worked, but for me, it didn't. Probably because I'm on a Mac OS. I really just did not know. I want others to know about this serious issue, so they don't "Walk into a trap" like I did. Bottom line.... current PyMakr does NOT work on Atom. The install script has bugs I pointed out in the issue #134 on the Github bug list. Absolutely NO workaround ever presented to me has worked. Fact: I'm more then 2 months late in delivering a project, and now my gig may be ripped from under me, just because I believed that the Pymakr developers were doing their jobs, they are not. And now MY job is at risk. I respectfully request that the PyMakr developer contact me. I live in USA in Las Vegas. I can be reached at +1 818-640-5290. I'm on Signal, Telegram, and WhatsApp, as well as Riot as jdcrunchman@gmail.com I am a disabled vet, so my brain is not often up to par with most people. I'm posting it here for two reasons... Reason #1 - to tell others planning to use this product that it's broken, and there are no workarounds, and for them to try using other options. Reason #2 - to reach out to more people at PyCom to express my dissatisfaction and hardship I'm having in using these tools, as well as telling others intending to use Atom and PyMakr that they might want to wait until the product is a bit more mature before attempting to use it. Regards John D jdcrunchman@gmail.com
• F

  This topic is deleted!
  Sep 18, 2019, 7:13 AM • ferfersan6   Sep 18, 2019, 7:13 AM

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  26
  Views
• G

  connecting Lopy4 kit to Wi-Fi
  Sep 17, 2019, 6:59 PM • gfadlallah   Sep 17, 2019, 7:14 PM

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  148
  Views

  Sep 17, 2019, 7:14 PM

  @gfadlallah Look here, subtitle "Copnnecting to a router": https://docs.pycom.io/tutorials/all/wlan/
• J

  5g capabilities
  pycom pycom upgrade pycom team • Aug 29, 2019, 3:08 AM • Jordan Reyes   Aug 29, 2019, 5:44 AM

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  256
  Views

  E Aug 29, 2019, 5:44 AM

  @Jordan-Reyes Technically speaking Fipy (Fi as five perhaps...) is a 5G module. LTE-M and NB-IOT are inside 5G scope network. But if you have in minds higher data bandwith we must be wait some years i guess.
• D

  LoPy4 Firmware 1.17.1.b1
  Aug 28, 2019, 11:59 AM • dttars02   Aug 28, 2019, 11:59 AM

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  492
  Views

  No one has replied

• P

  LoRaWAN Duty Cycle restriction
  duty cycle • Oct 29, 2018, 7:56 AM • PP   Aug 19, 2019, 1:17 PM

  17
  0
  Votes
  17
  Posts
  3.2k
  Views

  Aug 19, 2019, 1:17 PM

  @prashanth It is in the release candidate version 1.20.0 rc12. You have to use the downloader 1.15.2 https://forum.pycom.io/topic/3425/new-beta-firmware-updater-1-15-2-b0 and/or download the tar file from https://forum.pycom.io/topic/2777/downgrading-firmware-advanced-users
• 

  This topic is deleted!
  Aug 17, 2019, 1:32 PM • bettyLodges   Aug 17, 2019, 1:32 PM

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  16
  Views

  No one has replied

• Z

  This topic is deleted!
  Aug 17, 2019, 6:56 AM • zhangsan   Aug 17, 2019, 6:56 AM

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  5
  Views

  No one has replied

• P

  This topic is deleted!
  Aug 17, 2019, 6:32 AM • pingko   Aug 17, 2019, 6:32 AM

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  27
  Views

  No one has replied

• H

  This topic is deleted!
  Aug 16, 2019, 7:43 AM • helenouba   Aug 16, 2019, 7:43 AM

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  2
  Views

  No one has replied